yep, I agree even if this is painful.
+1

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:56 PM Zachary Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1; I think a lot of us have voiced support over the years for decoupling
> the Wave server from its current GUI, and it sounds like this approach
> would be a great shift in that direction.
>
> Zachary Yaro
>
> On Tuesday, 21 March 2017, Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Pablo,
> >
> > +1 on this approach. I think this is the best idea if we can pull it off.
> >
> > ~Michael
> >
> > On 3/21/17, 8:30 AM, "Pablo Ojanguren" <pablo...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     At this moment I don't see Wave as a downstream dependency of
> SwellRT.
> >     (SwellRT depending on Wave, right?)
> >     SwellRT has modified Wave in different parts, so there is not a clear
> >     separation of responsibilities right now.
> >
> >     Personally I would rather Wave to take over SwellRT entirely and
> > liberate
> >     Wave from the current GUI and become something generic. Then I would
> > work
> >     on Wave primarily, keeping SwellRT as a fork with maybe very specific
> >     customizations to support jetpad.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     2017-03-20 21:27 GMT+01:00 Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk
> <javascript:;>>:
> >
> >     > Pablo,
> >     >
> >     > Do you see Wave's copy of SwellRT as a fork? Or perhaps as a
> > downstream
> >     > dependency of SwellRT? How do you see the SwellRT team
> collaborating
> >     > with Wave?
> >     >
> >     > Upayavira
> >     >
> >     > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, at 03:25 PM, Pablo Ojanguren wrote:
> >     > > ICLAs from original copyright owners of SwellRT source code has
> > been
> >     > > signed
> >     > > and sent to Apache. This implies, AFAIK that Wave community is
> free
> >     > > (libre)
> >     > > to use SwellRT's source code entirely or parts of it without
> risks
> > of
> >     > > raising any IP issues. This makes safer, legally speaking, any
> >     > > collaboration between communities involving the source code.
> >     > >
> >     > > This doesn't imply any commitment from Wave taking over SwellRT
> > source
> >     > > code, roadmap...and in particular SwellRT brand, that is a
> > separated
> >     > > matter.
> >     > >
> >     > > How SwellRT source code can be exploited by Wave is a community
> > choice. I
> >     > > think those more technically involved in the project should
> > address the
> >     > > discussion. My email is a part of this aim. I expect your point
> of
> > view
> >     > > so
> >     > > we can define a tech road map.
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > 2017-03-20 15:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>:
> >     > >
> >     > > > Thanks for all the info but doesn't quite answers some of the
> > more
> >     > pressing
> >     > > > questions.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Has swellrt been donated to the incubator as in the incubator
> is
> > now
> >     > where
> >     > > > the official swellrt development will happen? Does this include
> > the
> >     > > > branding asset's? How do we want to handle publishing of the
> > swellrt
> >     > as a
> >     > > > sub part of this project.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > ~ Evan
> >     > > >
> >     > > > On 20 Mar 2017 11:22 PM, "Pablo Ojanguren" <pablo...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Hi all,
> >     > > >
> >     > > > My apologies for the late update on SwellRT. I hope this email
> > could
> >     > help
> >     > > > to clarify the ongoing discussion.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > As summary SwellRT objective is to make Wave generic...
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Instead of Wave Conversations it provides generic Collaborative
> >     > Objects.
> >     > > > Instead of a GUI it provides an API.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *Current status:*
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *JavaScript Beta client*
> >     > > >
> >     > > >    - Based on the original Web client.
> >     > > >    - No dependencies with GWT UI components.
> >     > > >    - No dependencies with JSNI thanks to JSInterop.
> >     > > >    - It allows to mutate and sync Javascript objects (ES6
> > Proxies).
> >     > > >    - This implementation is expected to ease generation of
> > Android and
> >     > iOS
> >     > > >    clients.
> >     > > >    - Basic features are in place but some others are still not
> > migrated
> >     > > >    from alpha.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Check out README[1] and Wiki[2] for usage details. To dive into
> > the
> >     > code,
> >     > > > see package *org.swellrt.beta,* and the classes
> >     > > > *ServiceFrontendEntryPoint*
> >     > > > and *SObjectRemote*
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *Collaborative Editor Component*
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Task to provide the Wave text editor as a separated component,
> so
> >     > > > eventually it could be replaced. So far, it exposes following
> > features
> >     > as
> >     > > > API
> >     > > >
> >     > > >    - Annotations
> >     > > >    - User presence
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Currently I am debugging it for mobile browsers.
> >     > > > Widgets API coming soon.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Package org.swellrt.beta.client.js.editor [3]
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *Federation with Matrix.org*
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Testing the proposed implementation [4] from GSoC'16 student.
> We
> > would
> >     > like
> >     > > > to provide a PR asap.
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *JetPad*
> >     > > > We are developing SwellRT together with a real application of
> it,
> >     > > > jetpad.net
> >     > > > [5] a collaborative text editor.
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *Google Sumer of Code 2017*
> >     > > > We are also participating in GSoC17 thanks to the support of
> >     > Universidad
> >     > > > Complutense de Madrid and Berkman Klein Center (Harvard)
> >     > > > Please encourage any students to send proposals, not limited to
> > our
> >     > > > suggestions [6]. Deadline is April 3.
> >     > > > For example, we are considering a proposal of e2e encryption
> > based on
> >     > [7]
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > *Wave + SwellRT*
> >     > > > I guess the question to answer in the community is whether
> > SwellRT can
> >     > be
> >     > > > used as is, or adapted, or part of it, to provide a new Wave
> UI.
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Thank you,
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Pablo
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > [1] https://github.com/P2Pvalue/swellrt/blob/master/README.md
> >     > > > [2] https://github.com/P2Pvalue/swellrt/wiki
> >     > > > [3]
> >     > > > https://github.com/P2Pvalue/swellrt/tree/master/wave/src/
> >     > > > main/java/org/swellrt/beta/client/js/editor
> >     > > > [4] https://github.com/Waqee/incubator-wave/blob/master/
> >     > > > MATRIX-FEDERATION.md
> >     > > > [5] https://jetpad.net/
> >     > > > [6] https://cyber.harvard.edu/gsoc/SwellRT
> >     > > > [7] http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/68179/
> >     > > > paper.pdf?sequence=1
> >     > > >
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Zachary Yaro
>

Reply via email to