Now's a good time for folks to start looking at this code. 

People who previously tried using Wave, but found it too complicated -
take a look at this branch - is it easier to work with? Are there places
you think you could usefully contribute?

Upayavira

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, at 12:40 PM, Adam John wrote:
> Thanks Yuri!
> 
> Adam John
> (914) 623-8433
> 
> On Nov 16, 2016 6:36 AM, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I pushed SwellRT into Wave repo as a branch.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:49 AM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thqnkyou for this, tuesday is my last exam for the year so I should be
> > able
> > > to start removing dependencies then.
> > >
> > > On 11/11/2016 8:11 PM, "Pablo Ojanguren" <pablo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Sure Evan, cleaning up dependencies seems a good starting point.
> > > Yes, SwellRT is basically the same source code than Wave so this is a
> > > win-win situation.
> > >
> > > I am updating the following spreedsheet to track down dependences in
> > order
> > > to decide further actions, any contribution is welcome of course
> > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZekN8665BTHt_qL859HRmp7-
> > > k59IkifFSZi7C0iZc3I/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> > > Could some of you clone SwellRT's master into a Wave's branch?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-11-01 5:00 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > with the proposal of joining the sources can we begin work by filtering
> > > out
> > > > unused dependencies and upgrading old ones for both repos. My
> > > understanding
> > > > is that Swellrt uses the base of Wave so this would be beneficial for
> > > both
> > > > projects.
> > > >
> > > > If any of the swellrt peeps are here and would put their hand up for
> > > > helping decided what can be removed as we have a very large collection
> > of
> > > > out dated dependencies. This should be the first step as currently I
> > have
> > > a
> > > > bunch of security emails relating to our old dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > ~ Evan
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to