Ian just to make sure can you do a ant clean and remove the 3rd party and
try again, also let us know which commands you were running to make this.

On 7 December 2015 at 22:01, Ian Dunlop <ianwdun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Having problems building wave with java 1.7.0_79 and ant 1.9.6 on windows
> 7. Stack trace below. Fails when compiling wave-api. Seems to be a warning
> with regards to generics. Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> compile:
>      [echo] Compiling wave-api-0.6.0
>     [javac] Compiling 37 source files to
> C:\Users\idunlop\code\incubator-wave\build\src
>     [javac]
>
> C:\Users\idunlop\code\incubator-wave\src\org\waveprotocol\wave\model\document\ObservableMutableDocument.java
> :54: warning: [overloads]
> with(org.waveprotocol.wave.model.document.ObservableMutableDocument.Action)
> in ObservableMutableDocument is potentially ambiguous with
> with(org.waveprotocol.wave.model.document.MutableDocument.Action) in
> MutableDoc
> ument
>     [javac]   public void with(Action
> actionToRunWithObservableMutableDocument);
>     [javac]               ^
>     [javac]
>
> C:\Users\idunlop\code\incubator-wave\src\org\waveprotocol\wave\model\document\ObservableMutableDocument.java
> :55: warning: [overloads]
>
> <V#1>with(org.waveprotocol.wave.model.document.ObservableMutableDocument.Method<V#1>)
> in ObservableMutableDocument is potentially ambiguous with
> <V#2>with(org.waveprotocol.wave.model.document.MutableDocument.Method
> <V#2>) in MutableDocument
>     [javac]   public <V> V with(Method<V> methodToRunWithMutableDocument);
>     [javac]                ^
>     [javac]   where V#1,V#2 are type-variables:
>     [javac]     V#1 extends Object declared in method
> <V#1>with(org.waveprotocol.wave.model.document.ObservableMutableDo
> cument.Method<V#1>)
>     [javac]     V#2 extends Object declared in method
> <V#2>with(org.waveprotocol.wave.model.document.MutableDocument.Met
> hod<V#2>)
>     [javac] error: warnings found and -Werror specified
>     [javac] 1 error
>     [javac] 2 warnings
>
> BUILD FAILED
>

Reply via email to