Sure, I ll take it from here, just need to refresh my memory on the procedure. On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 at 11:25, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems the clutches of University/College/Higher Education have stolen ali > from us, would anyone be able to move this process forward? > > On 31 October 2015 at 06:13, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > @Ali, can you please proceed with sending the vote result and pushing the > > artifacts? > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:11 PM Michael MacFadden < > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It would seem so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/27/15, 7:34 PM, "Evan Hughes" <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >I believe we have enough votes if I'm not mistaken? > > > > > > > >On 26 October 2015 at 11:53, Rahul Tokase <rahultok...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> On 26 Oct 2015 00:53, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hey folks, > > > >> > > > > >> > I checked but didn't find anything. +1 from me. > > > >> > > > > >> > I checked on legals of course. > > > >> > > > > >> > Cheers > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 01:11, Evan Hughes wrote: > > > >> > > +1 > > > >> > > On 24/10/2015 4:17 AM, "Ben Hegarty" <heg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > +1 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Michael MacFadden < > > > >> > > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > +1 > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On 10/22/15, 2:13 PM, "Alex North" <a...@alexn.id.au> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >+1 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 at 22:08 Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado < > > > >> > > > v...@ourproject.org> > > > >> > > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> El 10/10/15 a las 08:58, Ali Lown escribió: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi all, > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > RC10 is now available for review. > > > >> > > > > >> > Artefacts can be found here: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/ > > > >> > > > > >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > > > > > >> $f.sha') > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for > > > >> convenience. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > The release version (if successful) will be > > > 0.4.0-incubating > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the > > > incubator-wave > > > >> > > > > >> repository. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts > > > >> include: > > > >> > > > > >> > - Use of typesafe config > > > >> > > > > >> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc. > > > >> > > > > >> > - Assorted tweaks to build system > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > A summary of useful information can be found in > > > RELEASE-NOTES, > > > >> and a > > > >> > > > > >> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Action Required: > > > >> > > > > >> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the > > > source > > > >> ones) > > > >> > > > > >> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime > > > problems in > > > >> a > > > >> > > > > >> > 'standard' configuration. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as > there > > is > > > >> plenty > > > >> > > > of > > > >> > > > > >> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we > > do > > > >> want to > > > >> > > > get > > > >> > > > > >> > 0.4 out soon (at long last). > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > [ ] +1 Release it! > > > >> > > > > >> > [ ] +0 Ok, but... > > > >> > > > > >> > [ ] -0 Ok, but you really should fix... > > > >> > > > > >> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because... > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > >> > Ali > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> If is not too late: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks Ali, > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> Vicente > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> PS: Tested the binaries, and sources (compiling, etc), > > > >> registration, > > > >> > > > > >> editing, etc. About legal, etc: "ant audit-licenses" > looks > > > good > > > >> to my > > > >> > > > > >> (only a warning about a atmosphere minified version that > is > > > >> Apache > > > >> > > > > >> licensed). > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > Regards > > > >> > > > Ben > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
