Ok, I followed Vicente's suggestion and I think I have a patch.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi @Vicente
> So, what was the problem? Do you have the patch?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <
> v...@ourproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Some collaborator started today with this issue and I think that have a
>> patch...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 de agosto de 2014 19:15:35 CEST, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> >I created an issue in Jira for this.
>> >
>> >I bisected the problem to the commit that added jetty9.
>> >
>> >I tried using an up-to-date version of jetty9 - same problem on
>> >windows.
>> >
>> >Seems like some sutble problem with the way routing is handled in
>> >jetty9 on
>> >windows.
>> >
>> >I then ran out of time.
>> >
>> >Ali
>> >On 18 Aug 2014 11:03, "Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado" <v...@ourproject.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> El 23/07/14 a las #4, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado escribió:
>> >> > El 20/07/14 a las #4, Yuri Z escribió:
>> >> >> well, it is ptobably related to atmosphere use instead of
>> >socket.io
>> >> >
>> >> > I think is not related with atmosphere. See my old post:
>> >> >
>> >https://www.mail-archive.com/wave-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg05501.html
>> >> >
>> >> > I suspect that was introduced in:
>> >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/#15
>> >> > and line 559.
>> >> >
>> >> > BR,
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Anyone working on this?
>> >>
>> >> Bests,
>> >>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to