Was there some consideration on
BOSH<https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBOSH&ei=H3S_UsCpLoWJrQfSoIGQDg&usg=AFQjCNErRyfvZq8ZLxAM_EEEL0JYSP5U-A&sig2=ITaO7hhv_4oh5Ns7DsgN-w>
?

Is this the Socket.IO, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket.IO?

b.t.w. the web client doesn't work on Windows 7 (IE 9, perhaps)

On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah, I also think that Socket.IO causes a lot of issues. Once WIAB
> supported only web sockets, but then we added Socket.IO to allow more
> browsers that don't support websockets to work with it. It happened about 3
> years ago, and the only browser that supported websockets fully was Chrome.
> The problem is - Socket.IO was abandoned by it's author (Tad Glines is
> actually also WIAB committer but he is not active for long time). In fact
> the author himself suggested we would move to Comet or something similar.
> As for me - I think  we can just drop support for long polling and flash
> modes that Socket.IO provides and just use web sockets.
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Raphael Bircher <r.birc...@gmx.ch>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > Ok, by closer investegation, I have now a suspect for this error. Socked
> > io. Has someone any info how old our socked io is? Maybe it needs a
> update.
> >
> > Greetings Raphael
> >
> > Am 28.12.13 00:12, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> >
> >  Hi at all
> >>
> >> I test at the moment WIAB more intensive. I notice that sometimes WIAB
> >> dosn't save. This is nasty, because, you don't have the chance to force
> >> WIAB to save. The only way I see, is to refresh, but then you loos your
> >> text.
> >>
> >> At the moment I could not isolate the problem. I was on the same Wave
> >> with a older Safari, who has some crazy trubble with the editing. It
> looks
> >> like JavaScript problems for me. I will now continue editing my text
> >> without watching the edits from this computer. Just to see if the
> problem
> >> strikes again.
> >>
> >> Greetings Raphael
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to