(just duplicating the information in the doc for my future reference;) Eclipse Run Configuration
Main class: org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain VM arguements: -Djava.util.logging.config.file=wiab-logging.conf -Djava.security.auth.login.config=jaas.config -Dwave.server.config=server.config Then use the IP: http://127.0.0.1:9898 (or whatever you see in the eclipse log when you run) ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 12 December 2013 01:54, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, took a few days off to work on company project (a adventure game > engine programmed completely in gwt as it happens). > > Looking over that Google Doc, I copyed the settings into eclipse's run > options. However, on running I got a few errors; > > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:13 AM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.CertificateManagerImpl <init> > WARNING: ** SIGNATURE VERIFICATION DISABLED ** see flag > "waveserver_disable_verification" > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:14 AM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.WaveServerImpl <init> > INFO: Wave Server configured to host local domains: [local.net] > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:14 AM org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.ServerRpcProvider > parseAddressList > WARNING: Ignoring duplicate address in http addresses list: Duplicate > entry 'localhost:9898' resolved to 127.0.0.1 > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap > register > WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class > com.google.wave.api.Element > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap > register > WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class > com.google.wave.api.Element > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap > register > WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class > com.google.wave.api.Attachment > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap > register > WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class > com.google.wave.api.Attachment > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:21 AM org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain run > INFO: Starting server > 2013-12-10 07:34:22.140:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.1.v20120215 > 2013-12-10 07:34:22.875:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started > o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,[file:/C:/TomsProjects/wave/war/]} > 2013-12-10 07:34:22.875:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started > o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,[file:/C:/TomsProjects/wave/war/]} > 2013-12-10 07:34:22.875:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started > o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,[file:/C:/TomsProjects/wave/war/]} > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:24 AM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain$GadgetProxyServlet <init> > INFO: Starting GadgetProxyServlet for gmodules.com:80 > 2013-12-10 07:34:25.250:INFO:oejsKwbs.ServerMain$GadgetProxyServlet, > annotation=[none]]:Key[type=org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain$GadgetProxyServlet, > annotation=[none]] @ /gadgets to http://gmodules.com:80/gadgets > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:25 AM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.AbstractWaveSocketIOServlet init > INFO: Transport handlers loaded: {websocket=class > com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyWebSocketTransportHandler, > flashsocket=class > com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyWebSocketTransportHandler, > htmlfile=class > com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler, > jsonp-polling=class > com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler, > xhr-multipart=class > com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler, > xhr-polling=class > com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler} > Dec 10, 2013 7:34:25 AM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.AbstractWaveSocketIOServlet init > INFO: Transports loaded: [xhr-polling, xhr-multipart, jsonp-polling, > websocket, flashsocket, htmlfile] > 2013-12-10 07:34:25.968:INFO:oejs.AbstractConnector:Started > SelectChannelConnector@127.0.0.1:9898 > > > -- > Despite these, I think its working. At least "127.0.0.1:9898" in chrome > pops up a page with "*Welcome to Wave in a Box* @local.net" and a login > screen. Could it be? can I finally be ready to start poking at code, rather > then configuration? I hope so ;) > > So, I guess next question; whats the default logins or how do I set them? > Does registration work while its running? > > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 8 December 2013 02:05, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That's good. We didn't lose anything. I thought I had attached the >> screenshots of how to config Eclipse to run/debug Wave in a Box. But, I >> embedded them in the Google Doc instead. wave-dev-on-cinnamon - Google >> Drive< >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit# >> > >> . >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I can see screenshots, at least, some. Regarding compile times, java >> > compliance level and the compile errors if you dont set it. >> > >> > ~~~ >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > >> > >> > On 7 December 2013 23:49, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> > >> > > Attachments are dropped by the list. >> > > >> > > Ali >> > > On 7 Dec 2013 22:28, "Frank R." <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Fantastic work there. >> > > > > For the moment, I am going to continue trying to set it up >> properly - >> > > and >> > > > > making notes to update/clarify the guide as appropriate, but its >> good >> > > to >> > > > > have that as a fallback. >> > > > > >> > > > > Currently still trying to get the client running; >> > > > > >> > > > > >>you need to create a debug/run configuration with arguments set >> > > > properly. >> > > > > >>you can find the arguments by reading run.sh >> > > > > >> > > > > I assume you mean "run-server.sh" (or-import or -export). I don't >> see >> > > > just >> > > > > a "run.sh". >> > > > > >> > > > Sorry for the typo. run-server.sh >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Then again, I couldn't find any obvious arguments for the client >> in >> > > those >> > > > > files either. >> > > > > >> > > > > If anyone here is using eclipse could give me a screenshot of >> their >> > run >> > > > > settings? >> > > > > >> > > > Can you see the screenshots attached to my previous emails? Can >> anyone? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Alternatively, just let me know what the html file is the >> webclient >> > is >> > > > > supposed to be using as thats what it doesnt seem to know. >> > > Overall.html? >> > > > > Index.html? frame.html? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > ~~~ >> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 7 December 2013 12:25, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is the OVA ready for downloading. >> > > > > > wave-dev-on-cinnamon.ova< >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_OYKagpJexmdG5QYzhZeC1QNTg/edit?usp=drive_web >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Fleeky Flanco <fle...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > frank, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > thats pretty awesome, my only question is why you used LM 13 >> and >> > > not >> > > > > say >> > > > > > a >> > > > > > > debian cmd line only distro? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Because, it would be a development box with JDK, Ant, Eclipse, >> > Solr, >> > > > and >> > > > > > source code preinstalled and ready to use, i.e. ready for a >> > developer >> > > > to >> > > > > > start in a matter of seconds. It's for you to start playing with >> > the >> > > > > code, >> > > > > > rather than simply a demo server. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > either way nice work :) >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Frank R. < >> renfeng...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I've created a vm. Now, I'm uploading it to Google Drive for >> > > > sharing. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Here is the log of how I made it. >> > > > > > > > wave-dev-on-cinnamon< >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit?usp=drive_web >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Frank R. < >> renfeng...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel < >> > > > darkfl...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > >wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> > > > > > > >>> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and >> > "totally >> > > > > real" >> > > > > > > >>> phone >> > > > > > > >>> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. >> > > > > > > >>> After 5-6 hours its done. >> > > > > > > >>> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but >> > > still...) >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> What is the configuration of your PC? >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can >> read >> > > more >> > > > > > > details >> > > > > > > >> in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint >> > 13 - >> > > > > > Making >> > > > > > > >> of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive< >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit# >> > > > > > > >. >> > > > > > > >> And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google >> Drive< >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000 >> > > > > > > >. >> > > > > > > >> Hope that will help. >> > > > > > > >> [java] Compile of permutations succeeded >> > > > > > > >> [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient >> > > > > > > >> [java] Link succeeded >> > > > > > > >> [java] Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s >> > > > > > > >> [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> > > > > > > >> Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> Suggestion; >> > > > > > > >>> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with >> > everything >> > > > set >> > > > > up >> > > > > > > >>> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that >> to be >> > > > > > > unsuitable? >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and >> exporting >> > it >> > > as >> > > > > OVA >> > > > > > > >> file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file >> version of >> > > an >> > > > > Open >> > > > > > > >> Virtualization Format< >> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format >> >image. >> > > It'll >> > > > > > > resemble my Linux Mint box. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> Query: >> > > > > > > >>> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding >> it >> > > back >> > > > ? >> > > > > Or >> > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > >>> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that >> > > > doesn't >> > > > > > > >>> require >> > > > > > > >>> handing over personal details to a company? >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess >> > the >> > > > > trick >> > > > > > > >> should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I >> used >> > to >> > > be >> > > > > > > troubled >> > > > > > > >> by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box. >> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 1] >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such >> > > settings >> > > > > > after >> > > > > > > >> upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete >> > > > versions. >> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 2] >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a >> > > > clean-and-release >> > > > > > > >> build. >> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 3] >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make >> > sure >> > > > the >> > > > > > > >> compiler compliance level to be 1.6. >> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 5] >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors. >> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 4] >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> -- >> > > > > > > >>> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my >> > > > > experience >> > > > > > > >>> here >> > > > > > > >>> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. >> Possibly >> > > > > more-so >> > > > > > > >>> then >> > > > > > > >>> Apache vs Git. >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get >> > started. >> > > > ho >> > > > > > hum. >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> ~~~ >> > > > > > > >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > > > >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > > > >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel < >> darkfl...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 >> now? >> > > > > > seriously >> > > > > > > >>> >_< >> > > > > > > >>> > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ >> > > > > > > >>> > *files it under "do tommorow" >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > ~~~ >> > > > > > > >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > > > >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > > > >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel < >> > darkfl...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 >> > > > > > > >>> >> I'll downgrade. >> > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> ~~~ >> > > > > > > >>> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > > > >>> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > > > >>> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> >> > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? >> > > > > > > >>> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" < >> > darkfl...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but >> I'll >> > > aim >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > >>> >>> edit/update >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" >> for >> > > > > someone >> > > > > > > >>> getting >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > started). >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > --- >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Notes #4: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > --- Stuck #4: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Build error; >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: >> > > > > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] >> Created >> > > dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 >> > > > > .log >> > > > > > > >>> init: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: >> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto >> > > > [mkdir] >> > > > > > > >>> Created >> > > > > > > >>> >>> dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created >> > dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created >> > dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created >> dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: >> > > > > compile-proto: >> > > > > > > >>> [javac] >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Compiling 12 source files to >> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto >> > > > > > > >>> [javac] >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > >> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method >> > > should >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > >>> >>> qualified by >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression >> [javac] >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ >> > > [javac] >> > > > > > > error: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> warnings >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > >> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method >> > > should >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > >>> >>> qualified by >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression >> [javac] >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); >> [javac] >> > ^ >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, >> > > > > > > >>> result.removedContributor_); >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > [javac] ^ >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > [javac] 1 error >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > [javac] 40 warnings >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > BUILD FAILED >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following >> error >> > > > > > occurred >> > > > > > > >>> while >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > executing >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > this line: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile >> > failed; >> > > > see >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > >>> >>> compiler >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > error >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > output for details. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ~~~ >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is >> the >> > > > > README >> > > > > > > >>> file - >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel < >> > > > > > > >>> darkfl...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Stuck #3: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > "ANT" >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to >> > > execute >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > get-third-party >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > targ >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests >> > > > > compilation, >> > > > > > > >>> i.e. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> ant >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > get-third-p >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > ~~~ >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it >> :) >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel < >> > > > > > darkfl...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #2: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, >> > with >> > > a >> > > > > link >> > > > > > > to >> > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > >>> >>> Java >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #3: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command >> doesn't >> > > work >> > > > > in >> > > > > > XP >> > > > > > > >>> just >> > > > > > > >>> >>> by >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > adding >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already >> > > > existing >> > > > > > > PATH >> > > > > > > >>> >>> system >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" >> > > > > directory, >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > >>> >>> \ant at >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > the >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its >> added >> > ok. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as >> > soon >> > > > as I >> > > > > > > have >> > > > > > > >>> >>> write >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first >> > here >> > > > as >> > > > > > > well, >> > > > > > > >>> in >> > > > > > > >>> >>> case >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > I >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > have >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and >> > Win7 >> > > is >> > > > > > > treated >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > differently) >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > ~~~ >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about >> it >> > :) >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown < >> > a...@lown.me.uk >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route >> (that >> > is >> > > > the >> > > > > > > >>> "wave" >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > directory >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that >> > > doesn't >> > > > > > exist >> > > > > > > >>> now? >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> Yes. >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
