Abstention here too - if the committers want it, go for it. As someone just trying to get started, Apache or GitHub makes little difference too me.
~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 10 December 2013 18:11, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Abstention due to my limited experience of either ASF Incubator and GitHub. > Though, I want is a better future for Wave. > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > It seems to me that the time has come to make a decision here, and for > > now, I'm going to ask that we consider just one simple question: > > > > * Should Wave stay within Apache, or leave. > > > > I'm going to ask that we postpone any discussion about either option > > that isn't required to make the decision, until the vote is complete. If > > discussion is to occur, please move it to a separate thread, to keep the > > [VOTE] thread clean. > > > > I'm going to suggest that this vote runs for 72hrs, and that we aim for > > consensus. Should anyone wish to change their vote based upon the votes > > of others, that's fine, only your last vote will count. > > > > I'm going to suggest that for this vote to succeed, we'll need full > > consensus of committers/PPMC members. Community votes are also very much > > welcome, but committer/PPMC votes will be the ones that make up the > > final tally. If this vote does not receive a consensus, then the status > > quo will continue until another event occurs to change it. > > > > I myself am not going to vote, as I see this as a vote for those who > > feel ownership of the project and its codebase. I couldn't make an > > impartial vote anyway. > > > > So, here's your chance to cast your votes: > > > > [ ] Wave should stay at Apache > > [ ] Wave should leave Apache, and find a home elsewhere > > > > Thanks, > > > > Upayavira > > >
