Hi Ali, I am going to look at it in detail tomorrow (Sunday)
Cheers! On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Christian/Upayavira, > (And others are welcome to provide feedback, but I thought it best to > ask the mentors on this topic) > > Following on from 0.4-rc3, I have been (slowly) attempting to prepare > an rc4, taking on the feedback from the last vote. > > You can find my work for this at > https://github.com/alown/wave/commits/0.4-release-staging. > > This has: > - Moved all third-party things to be downloaded automatically during > build - one of the reasons for an IPMC -1. There are now no jars in > the src releases. [This makes it much smaller!] > - Fixed assorted licensing (notably src/python/api) and other files to > use the correct "Licensed to the ASF under contributor license > agreements" header. - another of the IPMC -1's > - Removed some more 'Copyright Google 200x' messages that were still > floating around > - Added SimpleJSON and Protobuf licenses to LICENSE. > > The other bit of feedback from the incubator vote was regarding > LICENSE/NOTICE not seeming to be correct. > I am unclear what should be being put in either/both now. (Especially > since the third-party items are downloaded rather than being > distributed by us). > I also saw it mentioned that sometimes LICENSE/NOTICE are different > for the source release, than for the binary release - could you > clarify if that is going to apply to this tree. > > Could you look over the new tree at the above url, and provide some > information on what should be going in LICENSE/NOTICE now. > [This is not a request for feedback on the release, rather just some > pointers on how to tidy up the remaining licensing problems before > making rc4]. > > Thanks. > Ali -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
