Hello Nikolay, I can advertise wiab.pro optimizations in the gadgets support. Gadgets works about 5 time faster, than usual wiab instance.
If you are interested, you can ask Andrew Kaplanov (akapla...@gmail.com) about his gadgets experience. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Karl Hansen <a2br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Consider rizzoma.com, possibly. > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, you can use shindig locally as gadget server. > > See > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201208.mbox/%3CCAHoDC1X3eL=-in-kdHaWvGk9=tdSxfHZWaDX5r=fniheqb8...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > for some tips on how to set it up. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado < > > v...@ourproject.org > > > wrote: > > > > > El 01/04/13 20:47, Вольнов Николай escribió: > > > > Hi Yuri, > > > > > > > > As I understood the design, we have a gadget container (it is a wave > > > > server), gadget server and some web-server with gadget xml. I run a > > wave > > > > server localy, but when I insert my gadget url which is on localhost, > > it > > > > redirects all calls to some google server and it doesn't see my web > > > server > > > > with gadget xml. > > > > > > > > So, my question was if we can setup a wave server somehow that it > won't > > > > send any requests to google gadget server and I can use some local > > gadget > > > > server (like http://shindig.apache.org/) if it is possible. > > > > > > > > At the moment, I have to deploy every time my gadget to somewhere in > > the > > > > public internet otherwise it doesn't work. > > > > > > > > > > For development, as we usually do some kind of complex gadgets, we use > > > GWT, and we use this: > > > http://code.google.com/p/waveconnector-gwt/ > > > for test the gadgets locally and deploy only when ready. > > > > > > I can give you some gadget samples if you are interested. > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > -- > > > Vicente > > > > > >
