Bumping this now that we are past the holidays. Are any Gwave team members here who would be able to answer my question?
—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro On 26 December 2012 06:08, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can only say this is a fantastic idea. > Wave, at its heart, is a protocol - and to be successful it not only needs > a flagships implementation, but also the resources and information in a > convenient form to help it spread. > > I'd suggest the site by structured with the easiest possible paths to > getting a wave server running as the forefront, with supplementary > information about various other options and extensions later. > Possibly also a list of current running wave servers (even if its just a > embedded google doc manually updated). It would be useful to have that info > up for people to test federation against eventually, or when its finally > possible to make standalone clients people can test them against existing > servers to ensure compatibility. > > And yes, Id hope google can be kind enough to give up that domain. > > On 26 December 2012 09:18, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I was thinking it would be nice to have a central user-focused site about > > wave that could introduce new users to wave and educate them about > > different wave services, extensions, federation, etc. > > > > Question though: I noticed wave.org is currently owned by Google. To > the > > former Gwave team members here, since Google is no longer pursuing Wave, > > would it be possible to give other wave developers control of the domain? > > > > Any comments? I also posted about this on the +Wavers > > community< > https://plus.google.com/114745581771396366390/posts/NDqSSeideJy> > > if > > you would prefer to respond there. > > > > —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > >
