I can take on the final step once it gets to that point. From: Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> Reply-To: <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:23 PM To: wave-dev <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Licenses
Hi all again, Sorry for the spam. I have uploaded a diff located at: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/ containing all the license stuff that needs to be included with the release. This includes some code headers that were missed. Something to note is that files such as HTML and CSS have to have the header as well, not just java code. We have some licensing issues that are preventing us from going ahead with the release: -junit and emma both use the common public license, which isn't compatible with the apache one -libidn faces the same issues only it uses the GNU GPL v3 license. As I see it we have two options: 1. Code around the libraries or find alternatives, which isn't really ideal 2. Contact the package authors and see if they'll release the software with compatible licenses. Another problem i've seen is all the signing, uploading, announcing and vote managing need to be done by the same person, with commit privileges. This ensures the PGP signature is the same the whole way through so Apache can be sure it's a legit release. So after i've wrangled with all the licensing stuff someone needs to carry it forward to the final step. -- Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com
