-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6777/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Yuri Zelikov, and Vicente J. Ruiz 
Jurado.


Description
-------

Following on from vjrj's review request #6339 which has stalled, I present my 
patch for WAVE-181:

This assumes that the blip's received time is the same as the sent time (a 
reasonable assumption for everything apart from a slow federation), and so 
displays the received time to the user instead of the 1/1/1970 due to the 
current deficiency in the c/s protocol.

I am choosing to do this rather than attempt to fix the c/s protocol since the 
June discussions showed an interest in changing the code organisation (and 
possibly protocols) -> which would let us fix this properly.
Also, with this patch, as far as a 'user' is concerned WAVE-181 would be fixed.
At the least, it is better than simply hiding the date, since that renders it 
more difficult for a 'user' to determine the order of a discussion.

Comments, and further discussion?


This addresses bug WAVE-181.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-181


Diffs
-----

  
/src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/wavepanel/render/UndercurrentShallowBlipRenderer.java
 1370447 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6777/diff/


Testing
-------

Works on my machine between 2 users on the same server.
Time discrepancies between this 'guessed' time, and the times recorded in a 
snapshot varied by a maximum of a minute.


Thanks,

Ali Lown

Reply via email to