Those problems might just be because of Cygwin.  Everything ran fine for me
on Linux (Ubuntu 11.04).

On Thursday, October 27, 2011, Yuri Z wrote:

> Christian
> I have some questions regarding settings in runant.sample:
> What values should I substitute for your-oauth-client-id and
> your-oauth-client-secret? I guess it's the same valuesas for Wave robot
> registration? https://wave.google.com/wave/robot/register
>
> Besides that the only issues were:
> 1. Cygwin - needed to convert to UNIX format using notepad++
> 3. The download of junit zip hosted at GitHub - was some issue with SSL -
> something like "unknown issuer", it could be also because of Cygwin.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Woot, great news! I am really excited!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Christian Ohler 
> > <oh...@google.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Fellow wavers,
> >>
> >> rather than making waves accessible in Google Docs, which takes too
> >> long, we are releasing our code in a form that will hopefully be
> >> useful in the short term.  You can find it at
> >> https://code.google.com/p/walkaround/ .
> >>
> >> From the project description:
> >> Walkaround is a variant of Wave, based on the Apache Wave code base,
> >> that runs on App Engine.  Walkaround can import waves from
> >> wave.google.com to allow users to keep working with their data
> >> regardless of the future of wave.google.com.  (The import feature is
> >> still experimental.)
> >>
> >> Much of the walkaround code is not specific to Wave, but factored out
> >> as a separate, more general collaboration layer that manages shared
> >> live objects.  These objects can be modified by multiple clients at
> >> the same time, with changes made by any client immediately broadcast
> >> to all others.  The Wave application is built on top of this, but the
> >> live collaboration layer is flexible enough to support other
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> Walkaround supports live concurrent rich-text editing, in-line
> >> replies, user avatars, wave gadgets, attachments, and we are working
> >> on integrating App Engine's full text search service.  For now, it
> >> does not support Wave robots, federation, or private replies, but
> >> these features could be added.
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Some of you have been asking about Wave on App Engine; perhaps this is
> >> what you are looking for.
> >>
> >> The Wave application in walkaround depends very heavily on the Apache
> >> Wave code base, but the general collaboration layer is useful
> >> independently, so we put it into a separate repository for now.
> >>
> >> Happy hacking,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >
> >
>


-- 

—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro

Reply via email to