Still haven't got any corrections on this so is it considered "done" ?
If theres any other tasks like this let me know, as I want to do what I can to help this project. -Thomas ~~~~~~ Reviews of anything, by anyone; www.rateoholic.co.uk Please try out my new site and give feedback :) On 2 September 2011 22:55, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > ah, cheers for that. > I'll get to the changes over the next week ) > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 31 August 2011 11:49, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, that's what I intended to say. I think that Google Wave is better > > suited for collaboration on a document than Google Docs. > > Actually I already did it - copied the contents of the doc created by > Thomas > > into a wave and made it public. The wave can be found at: > > > https://wave.google.com/wave/waveref/googlewave.com/w+EzBfK0s1A/~/conv+root/b+EzBfK0s1B > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> By "Google Wave" I think he meant wave.google.com, which, at the > moment, > >> is > >> a bit more stable and reliable than WIAB (no offense to Yuri's setup). > >> > >> --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 15:56, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > You mean at; > >> > http://waveinabox.net/ > >> > I thought of that , but I cant seem to load it. > >> > > >> > "A turbulence detected! > >> > > >> > Please save your last changes to somewhere and reload the wave." > >> > > >> > (starts as soon as a load - Chrome 14.0.835.109 beta-m. Doesn't work > >> > on the Beta of chrome?) > >> > > >> > > >> > On 29 August 2011 19:42, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Great work Thomas, thanks! > >> > > Just one suggestion - can we move the discussion to Google Wave? > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I wrote a early draft here; > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc > >> > >> > >> > >> Let me know if I am going along the right lines, and I'll > correct/add > >> > >> to based on feedback. > >> > >> > >> > >> -Thomas > >> > >> > >> > >> ~~~~~~ > >> > >> Reviews of anything, by anyone; > >> > >> www.rateoholic.co.uk > >> > >> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 29 August 2011 17:16, Michael MacFadden < > >> [email protected] > >> > > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > done. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> @Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would > be > >> > able > >> > >> to assign the JIRA task to himself? > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> >> Yeah :) Thanks > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> Would this do as the task; > >> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> >> > Epic? WAIB goes under there. > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > ________________________________ > >> > >> >> > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > >> > >> >> > To: [email protected] > >> > >> >> > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 > >> > >> >> > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a > >> > >> >> > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category > this > >> > issue > >> > >> >> > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" > !) > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > -Thomas > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > ~~~~~~ > >> > >> >> > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > >> > >> >> > www.rateoholic.co.uk > >> > >> >> > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >> >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in > the > >> > Wave > >> > >> JIRA > >> > >> >> >> for this and assign it to yourself. > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > >> > [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I > >> could > >> > >> have > >> > >> >> >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is > >> now. > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for > accuracy/missing > >> > >> >> >>> information. (and spelling...) > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> -Thomas Wrobel > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> ~~~~~~ > >> > >> >> >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; > >> > >> >> >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk > >> > >> >> >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >> >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki > page > >> > would > >> > >> be > >> > >> >> >>> fill > >> > >> >> >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at > >> > >> >> >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets > >> > >> summarize > >> > >> >> >>> Google > >> > >> >> >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, > etc. > >> > It > >> > >> will be > >> > >> >> >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to > understand > >> > how > >> > >> the > >> > >> >> >>> > project has evolved." > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to > address > >> > this > >> > >> TODO. > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z < > [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! > >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> - Jeremy > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < > >> > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> wrote: > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / > >> > >> revocation of > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > changes policy... > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion > >> page > >> > and > >> > >> see if > >> > >> >> >>> it > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive > >> > reactions, > >> > >> I > >> > >> >> >>> guess > >> > >> >> >>> >>> it > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" > >> > entry > >> > >> (as it > >> > >> >> >>> >>> won't > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > be a duplicate). > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website > definition > >> > and > >> > >> some > >> > >> >> >>> >>> general > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants > to > >> > help, > >> > >> that > >> > >> >> >>> would > >> > >> >> >>> >>> be > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > much appreciated! > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > - Jeremy > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z < > >> [email protected] > >> > > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The > entry > >> > >> should be > >> > >> >> >>> >>> renamed > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave > (and > >> > Wave > >> > >> in a > >> > >> >> >>> Box) > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> should be created. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for > creating > >> > Wiki > >> > >> entries, > >> > >> >> >>> >>> also, > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on > >> > actually > >> > >> >> >>> creating > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non > >> > technical > >> > >> >> >>> community > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very > >> > important) > >> > >> task. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up > >> until > >> > a > >> > >> couple > >> > >> >> >>> of > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > months, > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed > >> > Apache > >> > >> Wave. I > >> > >> >> >>> >>> think > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> it > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the > >> Google > >> > >> Wave page > >> > >> >> >>> >>> since > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new > >> > Apache > >> > >> Wave > >> > >> >> >>> page > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> should > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh > >> start > >> > for > >> > >> the > >> > >> >> >>> >>> product. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply > be > >> > >> undone, but I > >> > >> >> >>> >>> guess > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < > >> > >> >> >>> [email protected] > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < > >> > >> >> >>> [email protected]> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they > >> will > >> > >> have an > >> > >> >> >>> >>> 'edit' > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > button too. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < > >> > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> wrote: > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave > >- > >> and > >> > my > >> > >> >> >>> >>> impression > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> was > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave > in a > >> > Box > >> > >> >> >>> project. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> Most > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> of > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > the > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I > thought > >> > that > >> > >> it > >> > >> >> >>> could > >> > >> >> >>> >>> be > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> nice > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > to > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the > Wiki > >> > entry > >> > >> for > >> > >> >> >>> Apache > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> Wave. > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
