On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <v...@ourproject.org> wrote: > El 15/10/11 00:37, Yuri Z escribió: >> I think someone mentioned that probably just updating to Jetty 7 will >> suffice. > > Sorry, suffice for what? to solve the problem of compatibility between > chrome and socket.io 0.6? I don't think so. > > El 14/10/11 21:08, Nelson Silva escribió: >> Perhaps we should just update to socket.io 0.8 for now and try to >> gather some pros and cons for atmosphere. > > I was looking on that, and seems that is not so easy to update to > socket.io 0.8, or not for me. > > Bests, > -- > Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
I don't think there is a socket.io 0.8 server implementation in java. The wire protocol is completely different. As for flashsocket, as well as using an old version of the websocket protocol, it can't traverse HTTP proxies. I'm struggling with the same problems with ShareJS. I've implemented a BrowserChannel server for node.js and I'm looking at extending it with websocket support (where available). It'd be much less work for wave in a box to use atmosphere or something though. .. Or a bayeux implementation of some sort. -J
