That's a good point. I will go to the original site and put a note up that clarifies that the project is still active, but transitioning infrastructure.
Thanks. On Apr 28, 2011, at 7:38 AM, STenyaK wrote: > I understand. I suppose there's more pressing issues than that, so it's ok. > I do not have any specific question, only curiosity. Also I just published a > small article in my personal blog (see sig), and thought that any reader > arriving at the website could end up at the roadmap and get a wrong idea > about the real status of the project. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 16:28, Michael MacFadden < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Bruno, >> >> It's has largely stagnated since we are in the process of migrating from >> that web site to the new Apache Infrastructure. My hope is that the Road >> Map will be the topic of discussion over the next month or so. We need to >> get our developer wiki up and running first. Was there any specific >> questions you had regarding the road map? >> >> ~Michael >> >> >> On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:03 AM, STenyaK wrote: >> >>> The waveprotocol websitehas this roadmap [1], but it is outdated. Are >> there >>> plans to update it, or has it moved somewhere else? >>> >>> [1] http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box/wiab-roadmap >>> >>> -- >>> Saludos, >>> Bruno González >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com >>> http://www.stenyak.com >> >> > > > -- > Saludos, > Bruno González > > _______________________________________________ > Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com > http://www.stenyak.com
