I like the way this is heading. Should we make a new entry on the
issue tracker for that? To document our decisions maybe?

--
Marcelo Lacerda



On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Nelson Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been using Maven as much as possible for all sorts of projects (Java,
> Scala, Flex, etc..) and it is by far the external build tool that offers
> greater IDE support.
> Both Netbeans and IDEA work great with Maven and I believe I read somewhere
> that Eclipe's support will be a lot better in future versions.
>
> We now have ~ 60 MB of third party jars in source control and if we keep the
> code as it is it will grow larger, especially if people start making
> contributions to integrate Wave with other projects (support for other app
> servers, new persistence alternatives, etc...)
>
> Also, with the move to SVN people will be able to checkout just the module
> they need and can depend on prebuilt versions for everything else, this of
> course if we setup a simple maven repo.
>
> Were the current dist jars discussed properly ? Can't we use this same
> layout as a starting point ?
>
> I'm well aware that this is something that needs to be discussed but I'm ok
> with throwing my work away as long as it served its purpose which is to get
> this discussion going.
>
>
> On 26-04-2011 22:51, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>>
>> Nelson,
>>
>> I am all for this.  I am very experienced with Maven and the proper ways
>> to set up multi module projects including dependency management, etc.  I
>> think your assessment of the situation is correct.  We would ultimately need
>> a code free to get this done.
>>
>> However, before you go to far, I would try to get a real discussion going
>> on if this is something the team wants to do.  If so we need to discuss what
>> the right modules are, what artifact and group ids we would want, etc.  I
>> would hate to see you set up a lot of poms.xml that don't line up with how
>> we would ultimately do things.
>>
>> As a side note, if we did want to go to maven, now would be the right
>> time.  Everything else has to be migrated anyway, might as well take the hit
>> now.  However, I would recommend that we get the current source migrated
>> over first.
>>
>> ~Michael
>>
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Nelson Silva wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There have been several discussions on adding maven as a build tool.
>>>
>>> I've decided to start working on this by adding a tools/maven
>>> subdirectory with a multimodule project layout.
>>> I pushed my ongoing work to a branch in my GitHub clone :
>>>
>>> https://github.com/nelsonsilva/wave-protocol/tree/maven/tools/maven
>>>
>>> While a complete port to maven as the main build tool would required a
>>> code freeze and a healthy discussion of code reorganization into proper
>>> modules we should be able to use a simple includes/excludes approach for now
>>> and in the end, if everyone is ok with it, we could easily make the port
>>> happen.
>>>
>>> I would like to get some help with this from everyone who's interested.
>>> There are lots of plugins and lots of ways to acomplish things in maven so
>>> this should get the discussion started.
>>>
>>> I chose to go with GitHub so everyone can fork it and send me pull
>>> requests. If you'd rather go with the issue/patchset approach I'll open the
>>> issue but the idea here was to have several people contribute and not a
>>> single patch + review process.
>>>
>>> Quickstart:
>>>
>>> cd tools/maven
>>> ./install_deps.sh # This will install a couple of dependencies that were
>>> either patched or were not found in existing maven repos
>>> mvn install
>>> cd server
>>> ln -s ../../../war
>>> mvn exec:java # This should start the server, although you'll have to
>>> symlink the war directory for now
>>>
>>> TO DO:
>>>
>>> - Use profiles for dev/prod
>>> - Remove as many ant tasks as possible and use pure maven plugins
>>> - Use the assembly plugin to package the server with the webclient
>>> - Setup the surefire tests for each module
>>> - Rethink the modules, we should have pure api modules and the several
>>> impl modules for persistence, websockets, auth, etc ...
>>> - etc....
>>>
>>> Looking forward to getting this going...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>    Nelson Silva
>
>

Reply via email to