Yeah that is a bit of a pain, but I think we can manage if we have everyone who wants to attend register their addresses before hand
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, we should eat our own dog food :). The only problem I foresee is that > we can't just publish reference to the wave but need add participants > explicitly (no public waves yet in WIAB). > > 2011/3/30 Soren Lassen <so...@google.com> > > > That's a good idea. I'm in. > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:16 PM, James Purser <jamesrpur...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi Guys and Gals, I'm thinking we might try and organise another Apache > > Wave > > > Office hour, but this time I think we should use apache wave to do it. > It > > > would be an excellent way to: > > > > > > a) Test the existing code base with a "real world" stress test > > > > > > b) Test the federation code as it stands > > > > > > and > > > > > > c) Show that we're willing to eat our own dogfood > > > > > > I'm sure there are those of us with questions and code suggestions that > > > might benefit from a live discussion, so who's up for it? > > > > > > -- > > > James Purser > > > Collaborynth > > > http://collaborynth.com.au > > > Mob: +61 406 576 553 > > > Wave: ja...@collaborynth.com.au > > > > > > -- James Purser Collaborynth http://collaborynth.com.au Mob: +61 406 576 553 Wave: ja...@collaborynth.com.au
