+1

2010/12/13 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>

> Regarding the webfinger idea - there's gravatar.com.
> There are a lot of advantages in using such public shared profile services
> as gravatar. A user only needs to register - and all his public profile
> details become available instantly exactly in the format he desires. For
> businesses it would allow relatively easy option to integrate existing
> profiles -  they would just need to host their own gravatar like web server
> that would serve profiles. The URL of the "gravatar" like server would be
> configurable in server startup properties.
> So this way user should provide on registration only the userid and email
> address.
>
> 2010/12/13 Zachary Jones <keystonef...@gmail.com>
>
> > Perhaps the profile could have a record of 'adopted' waves (informally
> > moderated / active participant).
> >
> > A simple wave_adopted table as
> > wave_id
> > user_id
> > date_adopted (could double as a sort column, or make one specifically)
> >
> > I'm thinking of this for long-running waves that serve as documentation –
> > e.g. the proposed development wave(s) for this discussion list.
> >
> > This element would provide web structure in a similar format to the link
> > block in a blog, but provide weight more akin to the follow/friend list
> > (twitter, fb, etc).  Beyond these, additional behavioral data could be
> > derived regarding activity in 'adopted' waves.
> >
> >
> > Zak
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 12, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> >
> >  Hmm that is an interesting idea, I will go take a look at this
> >> infrastructure.  I definitely think that the account information will be
> >> abstracted away such that the account store / service is pluggable so
> that
> >> we could hook up to just a service like this, or an organizations
> existing
> >> infrastructure.  Again I think we will need a separate thread on how
> user
> >> profile information should work across federated servers.
> >>
> >> Still just trying to build the view of what we think the information in
> a
> >> profile should be.
> >>
> >> ~Michael
> >>
> >> On Dec 12, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Soren Lassen wrote:
> >>
> >>  I was reading about webfinger (http://webfinger.googlecode.com,
> >>> http://webfinger.org recently and it occurred to me that we could
> >>> consider using that protocol for serving profile data and for
> >>> discovering profile data. That way a client can look up the profile
> >>> data for each address that it sees by going straight to each address's
> >>> domain, thus potentially obviating the need for a mechanism for
> >>> federating profile data between providers.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe we can even use existing solutions (I don't know what they are)
> >>> to export profile data with webfinger for existing user stores.
> >>>
> >>> Soren
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Michael MacFadden
> >>> <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am thinking of adding some functionality around user profiles.
>  There
> >>>> are two main thrusts in the functionality.  The first is implementing
> some
> >>>> user account / profile API with some sort of pluggable architecture
> such
> >>>> that the account profiles could be hooked up to an organizations
> exiting
> >>>> user store.  The second would be implementing a basic self contained
> >>>> instance for out of the box functionality.
> >>>>
> >>>> The question I have for every one is what information should be in the
> >>>> user profile.  Right now all we have in the Profile API is:
> >>>>
> >>>> - Address / User Id
> >>>> - First Name
> >>>> - Full Name
> >>>> - Avatar Image URL
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I was thinking that to start off we would have:
> >>>>
> >>>> - User Id
> >>>> - First Name
> >>>> - Last Name
> >>>> - External Avatar Image (link to an external image) or
> >>>> - Internal Avatar Image (image uploaded by the user)
> >>>> - Email Address (assuming we still want email integration)
> >>>>
> >>>> Along the way, I would be adding a "My Account" or "My Profile" page.
> >>>>  Just looking for some design input.  Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> ~Michael
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Alain Levesque Wavewatchers

Reply via email to