Damjan, I think you are trying to explain one copy always occurs in memif communication,
Currently VPP memif plugin is wrongly/misleadingly written and it also misguiding to VPP users. When I look this code long back, it also misleading me. On Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 11:52 pm Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io, <dmarion= me....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > Please note that “zero copy memif” doesn’t exist. > > Long time ago I possibly wrongly/misleadingly added VPP feature with name > “zero-copy slave”. > > It is vpp internal feature which avoids 2nd memcopy by exposing VPP (slave > only) buffers directly to master. > In such scenario still one memcpy exists…. > > > — > Damjan > > > > > On 22.10.2021., at 13:19, Satya Murthy <satyamurthy1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks MJ for the quick reply. > > Will try this and check. > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Murthy > > > > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20366): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20366 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/86509719/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
