Steven, Thank you for the clarification.
Regards, Srikanth On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:31 AM Steven Luong (sluong) <slu...@cisco.com> wrote: > Srikanth , > > > > You are correct that dpdk bonding has been deprecated for a while. I don’t > remember since when. The performance of VPP native bonding when compared to > dpdk bonding is about the same. With VPP native bonding, you have an > additional option to configure LACP which was not supported when using dpdk > bonding. > > > > Steven > > > > *From: *<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Srikanth Akula < > srikanth...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 9:48 AM > *To: *"Steven Luong (sluong)" <slu...@cisco.com> > *Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > *Subject: *[vpp-dev] DPDK PMD vs native VPP bonding driver > > > > Hi Steven, > > > > We are trying to evaluate bonding driver functionality in VPP and it seems > we have disabled the DPDK PMD driver by default from 19.08 onwards. Could > you share your experience on this ? > > > > Also could you share the performance comparisons b/w these two drivers in > case it's available? > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > Srikanth >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20151): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20151 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/85656418/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
