What is surprising is everything works fine until I do IPSEC. The ping to local networks on the eth3 interface works fine until IPSEC traffic starts. After IPSEC traffic starts on VPP2 the connectivity on eth3 to local LAN is gone.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:20 AM Benoit Ganne (bganne) <bga...@cisco.com> wrote: > I do not see any issue in these logs, everything looks like it is working > fine. > This could be a config issue on the host side. > If you use dpdk testpmd between the interfaces instead of VPP, does it > work? > Also, you can try using VPP native virtio driver instead of dpdk, see > "create interface virtio" cli commands. > > Best > ben > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: satish amara <satishkam...@gmail.com> > > Sent: jeudi 19 août 2021 16:39 > > To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) <bga...@cisco.com> > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] DPDK initialization issues > > > > Hi, > > Here are the attached logs. I also see the counters on eth3 get > > increments after pings packets are sent out. The packets are never sent > > out after that. > > They are stuck on tx queue. Thank you for looking into this. > > > > Regards, > > Satish K Amara > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:13 AM Benoit Ganne (bganne) <bga...@cisco.com > > <mailto:bga...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > > > > > I do not think those are hard errors, especially if packets go > > through. > > To debug the ipsec issue we'll need a packet trace, eg.: > > ~# vppctl cle tr > > ~# vppctl tr add dpdk-input 100 > > <reproduce the issue> > > ~# vppctl sh tr > > > > Best > > ben > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> <vpp- > > d...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > On Behalf Of satish amara > > > Sent: mercredi 18 août 2021 20:37 > > > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > > > Cc: Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com <mailto:dmar...@me.com> > > > > Subject: [vpp-dev] DPDK initialization issues > > > > > > [Edited Message Follows] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to bring the VPP with DPDK enabled interface and > seeing > > the > > > following issues. Not sure how to resolve them. > > > > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice vat-plug/load Loaded plugin: > > > nsim_test_plugin.so > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Detected 4 > > lcore(s) > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Detected 1 > > NUMA > > > nodes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Selected > > IOVA mode > > > 'PA' > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: No > > available > > > hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: No free > > hugepages > > > reported in hugepages-1048576kB > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: No > > available > > > hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Probing > > VFIO > > > support... > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: VFIO > > support > > > initialized > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hint (0xa80001000 != 0x7fedc0000000) not > > respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hint (0xc00002000 != 0x7fe580000000) not > > respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hint (0xd80003000 != 0x7fdd40000000) not > > respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hi > > > nt (0xdc0a64000 != 0x7fd93fe00000) not respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hint (0xdc16c5000 != 0x7fd53fc00000) not > > respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hint (0xdc2326000 != 0x7fd13fa00000) not > > respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: WARNING! > > Base > > > virtual address hint (0xdc2f87000 != 0x7fcd3f800000) not > > respected! > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: This > may > > cause > > > issues with mapping memory into secondary processes > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Using > memfd > > is not > > > supported, falling back to anonymous hugepages > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Invalid > > NUMA > > > socket, default to 0 > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Probe PCI > > driver: > > > net_virtio (1af4:1000) device: 0000:00:04.0 (socket 0) > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Invalid > > NUMA > > > socket, default to 0 > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Probe PCI > > driver: > > > net_virtio (1af4:1000) device: 0000:00:05.0 (socket 0) > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Invalid > > NUMA > > > socket, default to 0 > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: Probe PCI > > driver: > > > net_virtio (1af4:1000) device: 0000:00:06.0 (socket 0) > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: No legacy > > > callbacks, legacy socket not created > > > 2021/08/18 14:12:17:921 notice dpdk EAL: VFIO > > support not > > > initialized > > > > > > cat /etc/sysctl.d/80-vpp.conf > > > # Number of 2MB hugepages desired > > > vm.nr_hugepages=1024 > > > > > > # Must be greater than or equal to (2 * vm.nr_hugepages). > > > vm.max_map_count=3096 > > > > > > # All groups allowed to access hugepages > > > vm.hugetlb_shm_group=0 > > > # Shared Memory Max must be greater or equal to the total size of > > > hugepages. > > > # For 2MB pages, TotalHugepageSize = vm.nr_hugepages * 2 * 1024 * > > 1024 > > > # If the existing kernel.shmmax setting (cat > > /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax) > > > # is greater than the calculated TotalHugepageSize then set this > > parameter > > > # to current shmmax value. > > > kernel.shmmax=2147483648 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But in spite of the error, I was able to ping thru the interface > > owned by > > > DPDK. Seeing issue for IPSEC traffic. So trying to find where > the > > issue > > > is > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Satish Amara > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19990): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19990 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/84979398/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
