Hi Florin, Thanks for the information. It's a good starting point for me
"VPP’s tcp implementation does not support keepalives" ==========> I assume VPP does not initiate one but can respond to any KA sent by the peer? Is this understanding right? Regards. On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Florin Coras <fcoras.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > VPP’s tcp implementation does not support keepalives so I’m assuming you’d > like to intercept/drop packets that flow through vpp. As far as I know, > there’s no straight forward way to do that. So you might have to implement > a tcp connection tracker and some heuristic to detect keepalives or a > transparent tcp proxy. > > Regards, > Florin > > On Jun 9, 2021, at 5:14 AM, Vijay Kumar <vjkumar2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi experts, > > Is there any way in which one can control TCP KA sending in VPP? > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:48 PM Vijay Kumar via lists.fd.io <vjkumar2003= > gmail....@lists.fd.io> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there any way we can control TCP graph node KA sending? >> >> My GW device is running VPP and connects with mobile phones. I have a >> requirement like my GW VPP must not send TCP KA if there is already traffic >> flowing with the peers (mobile phones). This is to prevent mobile phone >> batteries getting drained out unnecessarily. >> >> If there is no config to control this, is there any suggestion to >> start/stop KA at run-time? >> >> >> >> Regards. >> >> >> >> > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19546): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19546 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/83334560/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
