Re: [vpp-dev] About cnat FIB

[liuyacan]

Hi  Nathan,

   We hope to use CNAT to play the role of kube-proxy.  

   Since our applications specifies namespaces,  so we want CNAT rules 

   to take effect in different FIB tables.

Best Regards,

Yacan

On 4/6/2021 20:59，Nathan Skrzypczak<nathan.skrzypc...@gmail.com> wrote：

Hi Yacan,

There is no particular reason, just that the code for CNAT is quite new, and

we never implemented vrf support. I don't see any blocker to add it if you need it.

What is the use-case you would like to support ? By specifying a table ID, do you

mean for matching traffic ? Also for the rewrite ? Maybe DNATing to a different

table ?

Best regards,

-Nathan

Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 11:23, liuyacan <liuya...@corp.netease.com> a écrit :

Hi,

     

    We observed that CNAT translation rule now can only be set in the default table for v4 and v6. 

    Why is there such a restriction ?

 

Best Regards,

Yacan

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#19119): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19119
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/81885640/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-