No, a u64 suffices. See how the u64 works with a bihash for any value, not just pkt_filter4_0_value, in the code example given below.
struct pkt_filter4_0_value val = {}, *value; val.action = permit4; val.u.permit4.abits = 130; val.u.permit4.ig_strip = 0; val.u.permit4.outer_desc = 1; val.u.permit4.teid = 5241; val.u.permit4.ip = 0x03030302; val.u.permit4.src_ip = 0x03030301; val.u.permit4.dstPort = 2152; val.u.permit4.filt_dir = 1; val.u.permit4.reflec_qos = 0; value = malloc(sizeof(val)); memcpy(value, &val, sizeof(val)); kv.value = (u64) value; clib_bihash_add_del_48_8 (&ump->hash_table_pkt_filter4_0, &kv, 1); Hemant -----Original Message----- From: Benoit Ganne (bganne) <bga...@cisco.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 8:13 AM To: hem...@mnkcg.com; ne...@graphiant.com; ayour...@gmail.com Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] classifier howto? > A github link is included in the JIRA issue to articulate the use case, > <https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1967> https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1967 > The github link has a value for a classifier entry shown: > <https://github.com/FDio/vpp/pull/33> https://github.com/FDio/vpp/pull/33 > The value is a value used in a 5G UPF. Is the 64-bits value you refer to the "struct pkt_filter4_0_value"? It looks much bigger than 64-bits to me... Best ben
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18566): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18566 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/79925983/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-