Hi Damjen, Thanks for approving my change.
Hi Dave, That was what I wanted to understand. I think some folks here may use rpm's. If they don't want to take over the responsibility of maintaining the spec, I'm +1 for removing the rpm build and saving the resources on the CI. I just know that it means that the docs and vpp_config would have to be updated, but I don't know what else. Paul On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:50 PM Dave Wallace <dwallac...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with Damjan. It was orphaned by the RedHat folks who left the > project a long time ago. > I'd recommend removing centos support sooner rather than later as it is > simply wasting energy at this point. > > Thanks, > -daw- > > On 12/14/2020 1:57 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote: > > Is the maintenance burden the unwanted child, or the RPM itself? > > Now that it was announced that Centos 8 will be EOL'd at the end of 2021, > yet Centos 7 EOL's in 2024, Should we go back to supporting Centos 7 or > should we plan to drop the process of building rpms before Centos 8 ends > support? > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com> wrote: > >> >> AFAIK it is unwanted child…. >> >> >> — >> Damjan >> >> >> On 14.12.2020., at 18:17, Paul Vinciguerra <pvi...@vinciconsulting.com> >> wrote: >> >> Is there a maintainer? There is no entry in the Maintainers file. >> >> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30408 >> fixes failures on centos-8 due to an older cmake package. I'd bet that >> it probably breaks something that we're not testing, though. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18337): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18337 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78955767/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
