-----Original Message----- From: Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 2:16 PM To: hem...@mnkcg.com Cc: y...@wangsu.com; nra...@cisco.com; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] why tunnel interfaces do not support device-input feature?
>What are the benefits compared to normal hash table lookup we do today. >Any perf numbers to share? My need was to hash a 6-tuple (src-ip, dst-ip, ip-tos, protocol/ip6-nextHdr, l4src-port, l4-dst-port) for ip4 and ip6 and this is why I just used the paper's hash tuple. I did look at VPP's N-tuple classify implementation but didn't find the exact algorithm the paper uses. Sorry, right now, I have only used the paper's hash, so I don't have any perf numbers to share. When I get a chance, I will use VPP API, run tests, and get back. Hemant
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18114): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18114 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78307484/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
