> On 12 May 2020, at 11:07, Andreas Schultz <andreas.schu...@travelping.com> > wrote: > > > > Am Di., 12. Mai 2020 um 10:42 Uhr schrieb Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com > <mailto:dmar...@me.com>>: > > >> On 12 May 2020, at 10:10, Andreas Schultz <andreas.schu...@travelping.com >> <mailto:andreas.schu...@travelping.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Am Di., 12. Mai 2020 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io >> <http://lists.fd.io/> <dmarion=me....@lists.fd.io >> <mailto:me....@lists.fd.io>>: >> >> >> >> > On 12 May 2020, at 03:40, Lijian Zhang <lijian.zh...@arm.com >> > <mailto:lijian.zh...@arm.com>> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Damjan Marion <dmar...@me.com <mailto:dmar...@me.com>> >> >> Sent: 2020年5月12日 0:46 >> >> To: Lijian Zhang <lijian.zh...@arm.com <mailto:lijian.zh...@arm.com>> >> >> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>; nd >> >> <n...@arm.com <mailto:n...@arm.com>> >> >> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] clang-9 >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Lijian, >> >> >> >> If I got it right, neither gcc or clang available in ubuntu 18.04 LTS are >> >> able to >> >> produce N1 optimised binaries. correct? >> > Yes, that's right. Support for optimized compiling for N1 starts with >> > gcc-9.2.0 and clang-10, which are not available in Ubuntu-18.04 yet. >> >> >> >> If yes, can we just add clang-10 from: https://apt.llvm.org >> >> <https://apt.llvm.org/> to vpp build scripts? >> >> >> > Currently clang-10/clang-11 Aarch64 packages are not available at >> > apt.llvm.org <http://apt.llvm.org/> yet. Arm compiler team is working on >> > getting AArch64 packages available at apt.llvm.org <http://apt.llvm.org/>. >> > It may take a couple of weeks. >> >> So let’s wait then. For people who wants to use N1 probably there is more >> sense in >> using ubuntu 20.04 anyway, and 20.04 is coming with clang10. >> >> Yeah, but Ubuntu 20.04 and Debian Sid are in the process of removing python2 >> support and that creates a whole bunch of other problems. Removing the >> python2 deb references from `make install-dep` is relatively simple, but >> cleaning up the debian rules and control files without breaking support for >> older Ubuntu and Debian releases is more complicated. > > Can you explain what exactly is more complicated? > > Debian Sid has completely removed python2, but the debs still depend on them. > Making this more flexible requires some creative changes to the rules files. > We have worked around that [1],[2] by removing the python2 dependencies, but > that would probably break builds on older Debian/Ubuntu versions. > > [1]: > https://github.com/travelping/vpp/commit/77acccae792180f0ae94058a3b1ca7db0f995dd0 > > <https://github.com/travelping/vpp/commit/77acccae792180f0ae94058a3b1ca7db0f995dd0> > > [2]: > https://github.com/travelping/vpp/commit/7d52fd387b4c8a3a2f33c27f031b283d260301f2 > > <https://github.com/travelping/vpp/commit/7d52fd387b4c8a3a2f33c27f031b283d260301f2>— >
something like: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27010 Changes in ./Makefile probably require a bit of brain police form somebody fluent in python….
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16325): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/16325 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/73327785/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
