Are you running VPP with worker threads and using interrupt mode in memif?
can you capture “sh int rx-placement” on both sides? — Damjan > On 11 Mar 2020, at 15:44, vyshakh krishnan <vysh...@rtbrick.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > When we try to ping back to back connected memif interface, its taking around > 20 milli secs: > > vpp1 (10.1.1.1) ---- (10.1.1.2) vpp2 > > DBGvpp# ping 10.1.1.2 > 116 bytes from 10.1.1.2 <http://10.1.1.2/>: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=15.1229 ms > 116 bytes from 10.1.1.2 <http://10.1.1.2/>: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=20.1475 ms > 116 bytes from 10.1.1.2 <http://10.1.1.2/>: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=20.0371 ms > 116 bytes from 10.1.1.2 <http://10.1.1.2/>: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=14.9237 ms > 116 bytes from 10.1.1.2 <http://10.1.1.2/>: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=20.1059 ms > > Statistics: 5 sent, 5 received, 0% packet loss > > Is it expected to take 20 msecs for a direct ping? > > Thanks > Vyshakh > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15728): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15728 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/71880617/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
