Hi, I understand from your architecture that threads have a complete copy of the entire graph, to avoid locking etc.. But these days with more and more high end networking boxes having offload engines like QAT, I am interested to know wont that be a bottleneck ? The QAT hardware assist node would obviously have to be a single node shared across threads, so wont that reduce the utility of having the entire graph being a copy across threads (as opposed to the graph nodes being just shared across threads) ?
Rgds, Gopa.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14678): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14678 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/61874479/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
