> - Having separate plugin with own "special" version of DPDK is something I > don't like. You should decide either to go with dpdk pmd and extend > existing dpdk plugin, or create native driver without dpdk code.
I agree with Damjan, this franken-dpdk looks like a maintenance nightmare to me. What about future dpdk releases? Plus, we will have the dpdk and octeontx2 plugins incompatible in subtle ways (like bad surprises at runtime because the linker was confused with symbols using the same names at different addresses). ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13793): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13793 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32958934/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
