So I was trying to figure out why I was seeing this odd placement when i have 
"workers 3". This is on a macchiatobin. Please note that while lcore seems OK 
(since the code appears to use lcore 1 if "main-core" is not given)), the 
core_id values seem wrong.

root@m1:~# vppctl show threads
ID     Name                Type        LWP     Sched Policy (Priority)  lcore  
Core   Socket State
0      vpp_main                        4397    other (0)                1      
0      0
1      vpp_wk_0            workers     4400    other (0)                0      
0      0
2      vpp_wk_1            workers     4401    other (0)                2      
0      1
3      vpp_wk_2            workers     4402    other (0)                3      
1      1

If I specify "main-core 0" then the core and socket values are correct.

root@m1:~# vppctl show threads
ID     Name                Type        LWP     Sched Policy (Priority)  lcore  
Core   Socket State
0      vpp_main                        4405    other (0)                0      
0      0
1      vpp_wk_0            workers     4407    other (0)                1      
1      0
2      vpp_wk_1            workers     4408    other (0)                2      
0      1
3      vpp_wk_2            workers     4409    other (0)                3      
1      1
root@m1:~#

Explicitly setting "main-core" to 1 (which is the default) exhibits the first 
odd core value output.

I'm concerned that one core is not being used in the first case.

I'm working to get some cpu monitor installed here to actually see if all the 
cores are in use or not, but thought I would ask in case someone knows the 
answer to this already.

Thanks,
Chris.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13683): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13683
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32799378/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to