There is no limit on the number of slaves in a bonding group in VPP’s
implementation. I don’t know/remember how to select one port over another from
the spec without reading it carefully again.
Steven
From: "Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.y...@intel.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 11:09 PM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "Steven Luong (sluong)"
<slu...@cisco.com>, "Carter, Thomas N" <thomas.car...@charter.com>
Cc: "Kinsella, Ray" <ray.kinse...@intel.com>
Subject: some questions about LACP(link bonding mode 4)
Hi Steven and VPP guys,
I’m studying the lacp implementation. and want to know if it is
possible that Numa is considered in LACP active port selection. As we all know,
if slave with local numa can be preferred to help improve throughput.
One question is that current code seems no linking number limit for
active-slave, right ?
Does it mean if we can add any number of linkings to link aggregation group? If
two sides (actor and partner) are negotiated well for linking? I also don’t
see that how to selection policy in group. What do I miss?
Port_priority is set to 0xff by default and don’t change in any case.
If numa is considered, do we use it when negotiation happens, and make slave
with local numa selected in priority?
Thanks
Zhiyong
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13272): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13272
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32038398/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
