> On 19 Dec 2018, at 16:56, JB <john.bisce...@bahnhof.net> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> This is on "19.01", I've yet to test with 18.10. I've setup dynamic NAT.
> I've tested this with a clean setup without specifying anything special in 
> startup.conf. The results are irrelevant of other NAT settings except NAT 
> workers. I've tried specifying various networks, single IP as external 
> network, or a larger subnet of /24 or /23, no difference.
> If I set VPP workers to no more than 4, I see no issues in throughput or 
> latency, since then NAT workers are also limited to 4. However, if I specify 
> workers at 5 or above, latency is high on every single packet processed, with 
> averages of around 18 ms. Throughput is also severely affected, hitting 
> around 100 Mbps from an external server to a NAT:ed client. If NAT workers 
> are set to 4 or less, the issues go away.
> 
> Server has a single 12 core Xeon Gold CPU, 96GB DDR4 RAM in optimal placement 
> using all memory channels, and interfaces are two Mellanox ConnectX-5 100GbE.
> 
> I'm stumped, not seen this behaviour in the past or in anyone's experience. 
> Suggestions? 

Can you capture "show run" for both cases in following sequence:

1. start traffic
2. clear run
3. wait few seconds
4. show run


-- 
Damjan





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11722): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11722
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28802889/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  • [... JB
    • ... Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
      • ... JB
        • ... Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io
          • ... JB
            • ... Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io

Reply via email to