> W...What??? So the only way to make ip reassembly working correctly is to > keep one or more interfaces attached to a single worker thread? > That does not sound efficient ……
Or just ensure all parts of a fragment chain gets delivered to the same worker. Any good ECMP algorithm should do that. Cheers, Ole > > mik...@yeah.net > > From: Klement Sekera > Date: 2018-12-11 20:39 > To: Mikado; vpp-dev > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Any tricks in IP reassembly ? > Hi Mikado, > > if the fragments get split between multiple workers, then eventually > they'll get dropped after timing out ... > > Regards, > Klement > > Quoting Mikado (2018-12-11 08:52:28) > > Hi, > > > > I have noticed that “ip4-reassembly-feature” node only > > reassembles packets stored in the local pool of each thread. But it seems > > not right if a group of fragment packages is handled by different worker > > thread. So is there any tricks in VPP forcing the fragment packages in > > the same group dispatched to the same thread ? Or is it a bug ? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Mikado > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > > View/Reply Online (#11581): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11581 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28718629/675193 > Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io > Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [otr...@employees.org] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11584): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11584 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28718629/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
