Hi Damjan,

I want separate email-thread for the OCTEONTx mempool ops.

> Regarding the octeon tx mempool, no idea what it is,
OCTEONTx mempool ops uses hardware mempool allocator instead of DPDK software mempool. This is not enabled by default in DPDK but once enabled all buffers are managed by OCTEONTx hardware allocator.

> VPP expects that buffer memory is allocated by VPP and then given to
> DPDK via rte_mempool_create_empty() and rte_mempool_populate_iova_tab().
This I understood that VPP calls rte_mempool_populate_iova_tab() but I want to know why VPP allocates buffer on its own and not allow DPDK to create its own buffers? Why VPP cannot call rte_pktmbuf_pool_create()? Is there a limitation?

Thanks,
Nitin

On Wednesday 06 June 2018 02:20 PM, Damjan Marion wrote:
> Regarding the octeon tx mempool, no idea what it is, but will not be
> surprised that it is not compatible with the way how we use buffer
> memory in vpp.
> VPP expects that buffer memory is allocated by VPP and then given to
> DPDK via rte_mempool_create_empty() and rte_mempool_populate_iova_tab().

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#9542): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/9542
View All Messages In Topic (1): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/topic/21380227
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/21380227/21656
New Topic: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/post

Change Your Subscription: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/editsub/21656
Group Home: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev
Contact Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Terms of Service: https://lists.fd.io/static/tos
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub
Email sent to: arch...@mail-archive.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to