Hi Xyxue, There’s no plan to support IPv6 uRPF. However, a simple cut-n-paste of the IPv4 code (ip/ip4_source_check.c) and some refactoring of common parts would be the way to go.
Regards, neale From: <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> on behalf of xyxue <xy...@fiberhome.com> Date: Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 02:49 To: otroan <otr...@employees.org> Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] the source_and_port_range_check and the URPF support ipv6? Hi Ole, ACLS be extended to support port-ranges. Is there a plan to support ipv6 in URPF? Thanks, Xyxue ________________________________ From: Ole Troan<mailto:otr...@employees.org> Date: 2018-04-09 19:23 To: 薛欣颖<mailto:xy...@fiberhome.com> CC: vpp-dev<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] the source_and_port_range_check and the URPF support ipv6? Xyxue, > Do the source_and_port_range_check and the URPF support ipv6? > I can find the 'ip4_source_and_port_range_check.c'. Is there a plan to > support ipv6 in the source_and_port_range_check and the URPF? I don't think source_and_port_range supports IPv6. I've always been a little curious about the port_and_range_check use case. Could ACLs do the job? (or could ACLS be extended to support port-ranges?) Cheers, Ole
