Merged 11503, 11505 after testing on my vpp home gateway. HTH… Dave
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> On Behalf Of Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 6:35 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Multiple Static Mappings Fixed https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/11505/ Matus From: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 7:29 AM To: 'Jon Loeliger' <j...@netgate.com<mailto:j...@netgate.com>>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> Subject: RE: Multiple Static Mappings Hi Jon, This does not work properly, should be prohibited. I will fix issue. Thanks, Matus From: Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com<mailto:j...@netgate.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 6:52 PM To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>; Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <matfa...@cisco.com<mailto:matfa...@cisco.com>> Subject: Multiple Static Mappings Matus, Are multiple static mappings for a single local address expected behavior? vpp# nat44 add static mapping icmp local 10.10.10.100 external 200.0.0.1 vpp# nat44 add static mapping icmp local 10.10.10.100 external 200.0.0.2 vpp# nat44 add static mapping icmp local 10.10.10.100 external 200.0.0.3 vpp# show nat44 static mapping NAT44 static mappings: local 10.10.10.100 external 200.0.0.1 vrf 0 local 10.10.10.100 external 200.0.0.2 vrf 0 local 10.10.10.100 external 200.0.0.3 vrf 0 Thanks, jdl
