Hi Neale, Thanks for the clarification. As I am getting more familiar with the code, I will participate in contributing.
John On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > > > The VPP ping application is not quite smart enough to ping itself. > > If you are interested in contributing improvements I can help with > debugging and patches. > > > > Regards, > > Neale > > > > > > *From: *<vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of John Wei < > johnt...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 03:02 > *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > *Subject: *[vpp-dev] Can you ping ip of a host-interface from within VPP? > > > > It seems that VPP can't ping the ip of a host-interface, is this expected? > > > > setup: > > ip link add name vpp1out type veth peer name vpp1host > ip link set dev vpp1out up > ip link set dev vpp1host up > > ip add add 10.10.1.1/24 dev vpp1host > > > > vppctl create host-interface name vpp1out > vppctl set int state host-vpp1out up > > vppctl set int ip address host-vpp1out 10.10.1.2/24 > > > > Testing: > > On host, ping both 10.10.1.1 and 10.10.1.2 work fine. > > From VPP1, ping 10.10.1.2 seem not working. Is this expected? > > > > John > > > > vpp# ping 10.10.1.1 > 64 bytes from 10.10.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=.3155 ms > 64 bytes from 10.10.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=.1619 ms > 64 bytes from 10.10.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=.2049 ms > 64 bytes from 10.10.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=.1384 ms > 64 bytes from 10.10.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=.1031 ms > > Statistics: 5 sent, 5 received, 0% packet loss > > > > vpp# ping 10.10.1.2 > > Statistics: 5 sent, 0 received, 100% packet loss > > vpp# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [image: nline image 1] > >
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
