Hi Pierre, I would like to have two VRFs. The first interface belongs to VRF-1, the second to VRF-2 and the third should be shared between the VRFS (i.e., the default VRF-0, as I understand...).
Now, if a packet arrives at the first or the second interface, it should be forwarded via the third interface. I tried multiple routing configurations but they didn't work. However, they do work in VPP 1710... In my first email in this thread, I mention what configurations I tried and what were the symptoms. Ideally, would be to use 1710. But unfortunately, router plugin works only with VPP 1609... Thanks! Michael. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) < ppfis...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Can you be more specific about what doesn't work ? > > Jeff, do you have some time to look at the router plugin ? > > Thanks, > > - Pierre > > > Le 5 oct. 2017 à 05:22, Michael Borokhovich <michael...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > Hi Florin, > > Thank you for the response. The reason I stick to 1609 is the router > plugin (vppsb) that works with 1609 but does not with any other VPP version > I tried. So, I'm trying to get multiple VRFs works with 1609 since I also > need the router plugin for the project... > > Thanks, > Michael. > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Florin Coras <fcoras.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Michael, >> >> I would recommend you switched to a newer release (17.07 or the soon to >> be release 17.10) since the fib code has been completely reworked in 17.01. >> >> Florin >> >> On Oct 4, 2017, at 7:13 PM, Michael Borokhovich <michael...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to configure the following setup. >> >> GigabitEthernet0/4/0 - Table 1 >> GigabitEthernet0/5/0 - Table 2 >> GigabitEthernet0/6/0 - Table 0 (default) >> >> If a packet with DST_IP="10.5.1.0/24" received at >> GigabitEthernet0/4/0 or GigabitEthernet0/5/0 it needs to be sent via >> GigabitEthernet0/6/0. >> >> The following works for VPP 1710: >> >> vppctl ip route add 10.5.1.0/24 table 1 via 10.5.4.11 >> GigabitEthernet0/6/0 >> >> vppctl ip route add 10.5.1.0/24 table 2 via 10.5.4.11 >> GigabitEthernet0/6/0 >> >> But for 1609 it does not work. The routes are added to the default table >> 0 instead of tables 1 and 2. >> >> If I do just this (just interface name, without the next ho IP): >> >> vppctl ip route add 10.5.1.0/24 table 1 via GigabitEthernet0/6/0 >> >> Then the route is installed correctly to table 1 but the outgoing packets >> are messed up - sent without ethernet header. >> >> >> Any ideas how to make multiple VRFs woks in 1609? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vpp-dev mailing list >> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io >> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
