hi,all
I found ipfix plugin declares that passive time must be greater than
active timer. At Cisco router, we configure cache active timeout or inactive
timeout for ipfix or netflow. I think that active timer in vpp compares to
active timeout in Cisco router and passive timer in vpp compares to inactive
timeout in Cisco router. Howerver, At Cisco router, we always configure
inactive timeout smaller than active timeout.
Why vpp is different from Cisco router at ipfix? Please help me! Thanks.
Regards
chu.penghong
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
