No specific objection, though I don't think I understand why it was done this way in the first place. Laziness, perhaps?
Chris. > -----Original Message----- > From: csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Neale Ranns (nranns) > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:51 > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io; honeycomb-...@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event > > > Hi All, > > Any objections or support for this proposal? > > Thanks, > neale > > -----Original Message----- > From: <csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" > <nra...@cisco.com> > Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 16:02 > To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>, "csit-...@lists.fd.io" <csit- > d...@lists.fd.io>, "honeycomb-...@lists.fd.io" <honeycomb- > d...@lists.fd.io> > Subject: [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event > > > Hi All, > > I would like to propose the addition of a dedicated SW interface event > message type rather than overload the set flags request. The over-loading of > types causes problems for the automatic API generation tools. > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7925/ > > regards, > neale > > > _______________________________________________ > csit-dev mailing list > csit-...@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > csit-dev mailing list > csit-...@lists.fd.io > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev _______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
