blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Yes, im already saw it in jenkins, try to test this
tomorrow.Thanks, vpp crew! :)
Отправлено из Yahoo Почты на iPhone
Пользователь понедельник, июня 19, 2017, 6:48 ПП написал Ole Troan
<otr...@employees.org>:
Hi Denis,
> Yeah, we are testing SNAT 1:1 static mapping without port forwarding. Only
> local and external addressing in configuration for PPTP client/server.
Matus threw himself around and just did:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7187/
Which forwards (and NATs) unknown protocols, which previously wasn't done.
Are you able to retry with 7187? Merged about 10s ago. ;-)
Best regards,
Ole
> Thanks!
>
>
> Отправлено из Yahoo Почты на iPhone
>
> Пользователь пятница, июня 16, 2017, 10:53 ПП написал otr...@employees.org:
>
> Hi Denis,
>
> > Today we are testing SNAT plugin and PPTP connection by public ip and this
> > is not working.
> > Both machines have a static mapping, we are testing pptp by snat hairpin.
> > Even if one machine (in outside VPP netwrok) can trying to connect to
> > machine in inside VPP network (with static mapping by public ip) -
> > connection lost.
> > To be sure, we are testing this connection by local ips and this works.
> > Also, we are testing another two protocols - RTSP and L2TP and this works
> > fine...
>
> And you do have a static mapping on SNAT as well?
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/SNAT#1:1_NAT_example
>
> Cause if you used NAPT, then this wouldn't work, given that PPTP is GRE(-ish).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ole
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
