On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Luke, Chris <chris_l...@comcast.com> wrote:
> Definitely looks spurious to me. > > > > Chris. > Spurious or wrong? Will folks entertain a patch converting that newline to a 0? jdl > *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] *On > Behalf Of *Jon Loeliger > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:24 PM > *To:* vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > *Subject:* [vpp-dev] A Curious DHCP Hostname Terminator Choice > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > Way over in src/vnet/dhcp/dhcp_api.c, we find the function > > > > > clib_memcpy (&mp->hostname, hostname, vec_len (hostname)); > > mp->hostname[vec_len (hostname) + 1] = '\n'; > > clib_memcpy (&mp->host_address[0], host_address, 16); > > clib_memcpy (&mp->router_address[0], router_address, 16); > > >
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev