> You basically have two options:
> 1. Teach your routing protocol daemon to directly talk to VPP for configuring 
> the FIB.
> 2. Do not modify the routing daemon and let VPP map routes written in the 
> kernel.
> 
> For 1, you will need the router plugin, but for packet punting only.
> 
> For 2., you will need both netlink+router plugins. The netlink plugin (which 
> actually more like a library), shouldn't require so much changes though.

With TCP support in VPP I was playing with the idea of integrating exaBGP as a 
VPP plugin.
Use the Python API binding to program routes, and receive the BGP stream across 
a fifo (or even the API).

Cheers,
Ole

>> Le 26 mars 2017 à 16:31, Łukasz Chrustek <ski...@tlen.pl> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> thank all of You for clarification of status router plugin.
>> 
>> I'm trying to use vpp+dpdk as bare metal linux ruter with bgp and ospf 
>> routing protocols, goal is to make very fast router with dynamic routing 
>> protocols. Can You advice is there any other way to exchange dynamic routing 
>> information between os and vpp ?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Lukasz
>> 
>> 
>> The mailman did not let my last message go through because it was too big so 
>> I am removing the previous threads to keep this message under 100KB limit.
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Dave and Pierre are correct, the router plugin is no longer being 
>> maintained. There was not much interest in the community for this project at 
>> the time and I have since moved on to other things.  I’d be happy to help a 
>> new maintainer with any questions they may have.
>> 
>> If you really want to just test it out, I suggest attempting to checkout a 
>> commit of VPP close to the last commit on the router plugin. Somewhere 
>> closely following VPP commit 0bfe5d8c792abcdb, “A Protocol Independent 
>> Hierarchical FIB (VPP-352)” will work (you might have to git bisect to get 
>> something that compiles right away).
>> 
>> If necessary, I can submit a patch to remove the router plugin from the VPP 
>> sandbox with a note on the wiki page mentioning the finalization of the 
>> project. I recall there being an 8-month time limit for these the sandbox 
>> projects.
>> 
>> -Jeff
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Reply via email to