____________________________________________ From: Jan Scheurich Sent: Thursday, 16 February, 2017 14:41 To: therb...@redhat.com Cc: vpp-...@fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Interesting perf test results from Red Hat's test team
Hi Thomas, Thanks for these interesting measurements. I am not quite sure I fully understand the different configurations and traffic cases you have been testing: * Do you vary the number of vhost-user queues to the guest and/or the number of RX queues for the phy port? * Did you add cores at the same time you added queues? * When you say flows, do you mean L3/L4 packet flows (5-tuples) or forwarding rules/flow rules? * When you e.g. say N flows (srcip, dstip) do you mean matching on these fields, modifying these fields or both? Would it be possible to provide the exact VPP and OVS configurations that were used (ports, queues, cores, ports, forwarding rules/flows)? Thanks, Jan [X] Here are test results on VPP 17.01 compared with OVS/DPDK 2.6/1611 performed by Karl Rister of Red Hat. This is PVP testing with 1, 2 and 3 queues. It is an interesting comparison with the CSIT results. Of particular interest is the drop off on the 3 queue results. --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/attachments/20170215/83249b21/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: vpp-17.01_vs_ovs-2.6.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 243918 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/attachments/20170215/83249b21/attachment-0001.pdf>
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
