Perfect, this is going to help a lot. Much obliged folks. I'll bug the community if/when I hit a wall.
Cheers On 19 January 2017 at 03:54, Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Calvin, > > > > The VPP MPLS code is not specific to any given interface type and so we > support MPLS over all interface types that VPP supports. The logical > separation is achieved because all MPLS LSPs (and IP routes too) are > programmed in terms of next-hops, and any interface can be a next-hop. > > For example; > > create gre tunnel src 1.1.1.1 dst 2.2.2.2 > > mpls local-label eos 33 via gre0 out-label 44 > > > > or > > create host-interface name bob > > mpls local-label eos 34 via bob out-label 99 > > > > (I skipped the part where the interface is made admin up and IP addresses > are assigned) > > > > So to achieve MPLS-o-UDP one approach would be to follow this model and > create a UDP-o-IPv[46] tunnel. > > > > Regards, > > neale > > > > > > > > *From: *<vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Calvin Ference < > cfere...@inocybe.ca> > *Date: *Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 00:32 > *To: *"Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damar...@cisco.com> > *Cc: *vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] Plugin for mpls over gre > > > > Actually, MPLS over UDP has been asked by some of our clients, so that > would be perfect. Any assistance would be much appreciated, Ed. > > > > Cheers > > > > On 18 January 2017 at 16:42, Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > > > On 18 Jan 2017, at 22:39, Ed Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Calvin, > > > > We've had some consumers express interest in MPLS over UDP: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7510 > > > > Would you be interested in working on that? > > Or maybe, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2549 . :) > > Calvin let us know if you need any help…. > > > > > > -- *Calvin Ference* *Dataplane Engineer* *Inocybe Technologies*
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
