Hi Dave, Billy,

I’ve no objection to VPP rejecting the change of table mapping when IPv[46] 
configurations exist. I’ll make the change as time permits, unless some-one 
else beats me to it ☺
And update the documentation accordingly.

Regards,
neale

From: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>
Date: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 15:13
To: Dave Wallace <dwallac...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, Choonho Son 
<choonho....@gmail.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] show interface address with multiple tables

Dave, I agree with your statements about VPP probably needs to add the 
verification. I wanted to add that this constraint was added to the Doxygen 
documentation. But there are a lot of constraints that are not documented, and 
if they are, I'm not sure how to better propagate the information to masses.

From the Doxygen documentation for "set interface ip table":
Note
IP addresses added after setting the interface IP table end up in the indicated 
FIB table. If the IP address is added prior to adding the interface to the FIB 
table, it will NOT be part of the FIB table. Predictable but potentially 
counter-intuitive results occur if you provision interface addresses in 
multiple FIBs. Upon RX, packets will be processed in the last IP table ID 
provisioned. It might be marginally useful to evade source RPF drops to put an 
interface address into multiple FIBs.
Billy McFall

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Dave Wallace 
<dwallac...@gmail.com<mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Neale,

Given this constraint, IMO it should be verified prior to enacting the change 
of the interface table and the request should be rejected if the constraint is 
not met.  The $64,000 question is whether this constraint should be verified by 
VPP itself or the management agent.

Prior to open sourcing VPP, when there was a dedicated management agent, Dave 
and I agreed that constraint verification was the responsibility of the 
management agent.

Now that VPP is open source and there are potentially numerous management 
agents, it seems to me that including configuration constraint verification in 
the VPP might make more sense as a defensive mechanism.

In either case, there is a general lack of documentation on feature constraints 
that needs to be addressed.  In the past, I have worked on a system where the 
entire set of system configuration constraints was documented in the bug 
tracking system.  Needless to say, this was a less than optimal means of 
communicating the set of requirements.

Thanks,
-daw-

On 1/17/2017 2:20 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:

Hi Choonho,

An interface can only reside in (a.k.a be bound to) a single table. So each 
time you do;
  Set int ip table loop0 X
You are changing the table it is bound to, not adding tables. So the output you 
see at the end of the sequence is correct, the loopback has two addresses and 
is bound to table 5.

However, this is not a supported sequence of events. You MUST remove all 
configured IP address on an interface before you change the interface’s table.

Regards,
neale


From: <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io><mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on 
behalf of Choonho Son <choonho....@gmail.com><mailto:choonho....@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 00:17
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> 
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io><mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: [vpp-dev] show interface address with multiple tables

With multiple tables(VRF), show interface addr display wrong table ID.
DBGvpp# create loopback interface
loop0
DBGvpp# set interface ip table loop0 1
DBGvpp# set interface ip address loop0 1.0.0.250/16<http://1.0.0.250/16>
DBGvpp# sh int addr
local0 (dn):
loop0 (dn):
1.0.0.250/16<http://1.0.0.250/16> table 1
DBGvpp# set interface ip table loop0 5
DBGvpp# set interface ip address loop0 5.0.0.250/16<http://5.0.0.250/16>
DBGvpp# sh int addr
local0 (dn):
loop0 (dn):
1.0.0.250/16<http://1.0.0.250/16> table 5
5.0.0.250/16<http://5.0.0.250/16> table 5
DBGvpp#
The reason looks like
ip4_main_t has single fib_index_by_sw_if_index.
Even though sw_if_index has two table ID(fib_index) 1 and 5.
Last updated fib_index(Table 5) is updated at ip4_main_t.



_______________________________________________

vpp-dev mailing list

vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>

https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev


_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Reply via email to