That makes sense. Thanks!! On 14-Nov-2016 19:49, "Luke, Chris" <chris_l...@comcast.com> wrote:
> How would an untagged ethernet subinterface behave? What packets would it > receive and where would its packets be sent? How would that differ from the > parent interface? > > > > If you’re looking for more linux-like behavior, where you can create > logical aliases of an interface in effect to administratively group a set > of addresses, we don’t do that. If you want multiple addresses per > interface, just add them to the interface. Let your controller worry about > what they logically mean. > > > > Chris. > > > > *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] *On > Behalf Of *Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru > *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2016 6:27 AM > *To:* vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Creating an untagged sub interface gives "vlan > is already in use" > > > > Is my understanding correct? Or is this a bug? > > -nagp > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru < > nagp.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is this expected behavior? > > DBGvpp# show interface > Name Idx State Counter > Count > local0 0 down > eth-1 1 up > eth-2 2 up > eth-3 3 up > DBGvpp# create sub-interfaces eth-1 1 untagged > create sub-interfaces: vlan is already in use > > Thanks, > > -nagp > > >
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
